| | 01 | M-W---- | 2:30P-3:20P | TBA | Gais | No Final | 150 | 150 | 0 | | |
| A | --W---- | 3:30P-4:20P | TBA | Gais | No Final | 19 | 19 | 0 | | |
| B | --W---- | 3:30P-4:20P | TBA | Gais | No Final | 19 | 19 | 0 | | |
| C | ---R--- | 9:00A-9:50A | TBA | Gais | No Final | 19 | 18 | 0 | | |
| D | ---R--- | 3:00P-3:50P | TBA | Gais | No Final | 19 | 19 | 0 | | |
| E | ---R--- | 4:00P-4:50P | TBA | Gais | No Final | 19 | 19 | 0 | | |
| F | ----F-- | 9:00A-9:50A | TBA | Gais | No Final | 19 | 19 | 0 | | |
| G | ----F-- | 11:00A-11:50A | TBA | Gais | No Final | 19 | 19 | 0 | | |
| H | ----F-- | 1:00P-1:50P | TBA | Gais | No Final | 19 | 18 | 0 | | |
|
| | 01 | M-W---- | 4:00P-5:20P | TBA | Gardner | See Instructor | 35 | 34 | 0 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
|
| | 01 | -T-R--- | 10:00A-11:20A | TBA | Brown | See Instructor | 35 | 35 | 12 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
| 02 | M-W---- | 1:00P-2:20P | TBA | Colacchia | See Instructor | 35 | 35 | 15 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
| 03 | M-W---- | 4:00P-5:20P | TBA | Colacchia | See Instructor | 35 | 35 | 9 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
|
| | 01 | -T-R--- | 1:00P-2:20P | TBA | Baril | Paper/Project/Take Home | 30 | 29 | 29 | Desc: | This course offers an introduction to philosophical reasoning about moral issues. It will provide students with the resources and opportunity for in-depth philosophical examinations of a range of positions and arguments on a number of topics, including, this semester, abortion, affirmative action, deep fakes, Down syndrome "screening", factory farming, and generative AI. |
| | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
| 02 | -T-R--- | 2:30P-3:50P | TBA | Baril | Paper/Project/Take Home | 30 | 27 | 36 | Desc: | This course offers an introduction to philosophical reasoning about moral issues. It will provide students with the resources and opportunity for in-depth philosophical examinations of a range of positions and arguments on a number of topics, including, this semester, abortion, affirmative action, deep fakes, Down syndrome "screening", factory farming, and generative AI. |
| | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
| 03 | M-W---- | 4:00P-5:20P | TBA | Bell | See Instructor | 35 | 34 | 14 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
|
| Description: | Democracy is committed to citizens' status as political equals, including our right to have equal say in determining our joint political future. In a democracy, our voices are equal. At least in theory. As it turns out, many core deliberative practices, including argument and testimony, are distorted by individuals' social identities. In this class, we will proceed according to the following questions: How should argument and testimony work in a democracy? How does social identity, including gender, race and class, impact us as political agents within a deliberative context? More specifically, how does our social identity effect our practices of knowledge acquisition, maintenance, and transmission? We will study theories of democratic deliberation, standpoint theories in epistemology, theories of epistemic injustice, and conclude by considering several ameliorative theories. |
|
| | 01 | M-W---- | 2:30P-3:50P | TBA | Vollbrecht | See Instructor | 35 | 35 | 5 | | |
|
| | 01 | -T-R--- | 11:30A-12:50P | TBA | Ciurria | Paper/Project/Take Home | 35 | 35 | 39 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
| 02 | -T-R--- | 4:00P-5:20P | TBA | Ciurria | Paper/Project/Take Home | 35 | 35 | 31 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
|
| | 01 | M-W---- | 2:30P-3:50P | TBA | Koziolek | No Final | 30 | 30 | 18 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
|
| | 01 | M-W---- | 8:30A-9:50A | TBA | Gardner | Paper/Project/Take Home | 35 | 13 | 0 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
|
| Description: | Medicine is an institution that enjoys considerable social authority, an occupation that enjoys enduring prestige, and a research area that enjoys substantial public and private funding. Philosophy of medicine is an investigation into what we know about medicine and public health, and how we know it. What is medical knowledge, and where does it come from? What counts as good evidence that treatments are safe and effective, or that environmental pollutants harm health? How should we understand the concepts of health and disease, or decide what counts as a legitimate medical or psychiatric condition - and who are "we" to decide? How do concepts, methods, and findings in the health sciences influence, and/or reflect, industry, activist, public, patients' and policymakers' values?
The overall goal of the course is to develop a habit of reasoned, reflective engagement with research and practice in medicine. Students do not need a background in philosophy to take this course. This course is intended to be of special interest to pre-health professionals and to philosophy and science majors. For graduate students in philosophy, this course satisfies the seminar requirement.
Students do not need a background in philosophy to take this course. This course is intended to be of special interest to pre-health professionals and to philosophy and science majors. For graduate students in philosophy, this course satisfies the seminar requirement. Extra assignments will be provided to satisfy graduate course work; students should consult the instructor for details. |
|
| | 01 | -T-R--- | 10:00A-11:20A | TBA | DiMarco | Paper/Project/Take Home | 35 | 35 | 12 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
|
| Description: | A survey of major philosophical problems concerning meaning, reference, and truth as they have been addressed within the analytic tradition. Readings that represent diverse positions on these focal issues will be selected from the work of leading philosophers in the field, for example: Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, Davidson, Quine, Kripke, and Putnam. Students are encouraged to engage critically the ideas and arguments presented, and to develop and defend their own views on the core topics.
Prerequisites: one course in Philosophy at the 100 or 200-level, or permission of the instructor. Priority given to majors in Philosophy & PNP.
|
|
| | 01 | M-W---- | 2:30P-3:50P | TBA | Rosa | May 5 2025 3:30PM - 5:30PM | 0 | 0 | 29 | Desc: | All students enrolling will initially be placed on a wait list, so that preference for a seat in the course can be given to Philosophy and PNP majors and minors.
|
| | |
|
| | 01 | -T-R--- | 1:00P-2:20P | TBA | Barros | No Final | 0 | 0 | 32 | Desc: | All students enrolling will initially be placed on a wait list, so that preference for a seat in the course can be given to Linguistics majors and minors. |
| | |
|
| | 01 | -T-R--- | 2:30P-3:50P | TBA | Sommers | No Final | 0 | 0 | 70 | Desc: | All students enrolling will initially be placed on a wait list, so that preference for a seat in the course can be given to Philosophy and PNP majors and minors.
|
| | |
|
| | 01 | M-W---- | 8:30A-9:50A | TBA | Kvanvig | Paper/Project/Take Home | 35 | 12 | 0 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
|
| | 01 | -T-R--- | 10:00A-11:20A | TBA | Watson | May 6 2025 6:00PM - 8:00PM | 35 | 35 | 5 | | |
|
| | 01 | M-W---- | 5:30P-7:00P | TBA | Bell | May 6 2025 10:30AM - 12:30PM | 0 | 0 | 31 | Desc: | All students enrolling will initially be placed on a wait list, so that preference for a seat in the course can be given to Philosophy and PNP majors. |
| | |
|
| Description: | Thousands of lawsuits are filed daily in the state and federal courts of the United States. The disputes underlying
those lawsuits are as messy and complex as the human, commercial, cultural and political dynamics that trigger them,
and the legal processes for resolving those disputes are expensive, time-consuming and, for most citizens, seemingly
impenetrable. At the same time law and legal conflict permeate public discourse in the United States to a degree that
is unique in the world, even among the community of long-established democracies. Online and print media covering
national and local news, business, sports and even the arts devote an extraordinary percentage of available "column
space" to matters of legal foment and change, and those matters - - and the discourse around them - - shape our
political, commercial and cultural lives, as well as the law itself. The overarching objective of the course is to prepare
our undergraduates students to participate constructively in that discourse by providing them with a conceptual
framework for understanding both the conduct and resolution of legal conflict by American legal institutions, and the
evolution of - - and values underlying - - the substantive law American courts apply to those conflicts. This is, at its
core, a course in the kind of legal or litigation "literacy" that should be expected of the graduates of first-tier
American universities. |
|
| | 01 | --W-F-- | 10:00A-11:20A | Seigle / 109 | Cannon | May 5 2025 10:30AM - 12:30PM | 20 | 20 | 11 | Desc: | Sophomore standing or above required. |
| | |
|
| | 01 | M-W---- | 10:00A-10:50A | TBA | Salas | May 5 2025 10:30AM - 12:30PM | 80 | 80 | 0 | | |
| A | ----F-- | 10:00A-10:50A | TBA | [TBA] | See Instructor | 22 | 22 | 0 | | |
| B | ----F-- | 10:00A-10:50A | TBA | [TBA] | See Instructor | 22 | 21 | 0 | | |
| C | ----F-- | 10:00A-10:50A | TBA | [TBA] | Default - none | 22 | 22 | 0 | | |
| D | ----F-- | 10:00A-10:50A | TBA | [TBA] | Default - none | 22 | 15 | 0 | | |
|
| Description: | We live in a society that places enormous value on progress, innovation, novelty, improvement, and the like. In this course, we will engage in a sustained, critical investigation of this value-structure. We will ask what difference it might make to the quality of a life-to its goodness, and to the goodness of the experience of living it-whether it is conceived and structured as a progression towards something external to it (no matter what that something happens to be), or whether it is instead conceived and structured as an open-ended activity engaged in for its own sake. Doing so will allow us to ask about a different set of values, one that includes such things as maintenance, preservation, stability, and reliability. If the dominant ethical imperative of the present is "Always do better tomorrow than you did today" (an ethic of improvement), the alternative ethical imperative we'll be considering would be "You did well today; now do it again tomorrow" (an ethic of repetition, we might call it). In investigating these seemingly opposed value-structures, we'll also ask about their potential connections with, for example, boredom, anxiety, and burnout-and other ethical/psychological maladies prevalent today.
Philosophy 3991 must be taken by all philosophy majors who are not writing an honors project. Prerequisite: Senior standing, major in philosophy; preference given to those majors not pursuing Honors. Credit 3 hours.
|
|
| | 01 | M-W---- | 1:00P-2:20P | Wilson / 104 | Koziolek | No Final | 0 | 0 | 18 | Desc: | All students enrolling will initially be placed on a wait list, so that preference for a seat in the course can be given to Philosophy majors not pursuing Honors. |
| | |
|
| Description: | The main goal of this course is to familiarize students with a distinct philosophical corpus closely linked to the postcolonial conditions of cultural production in the Latin American region. The selected works will expose the connections between as socio- political reflection and intellectual development, and the characteristics of "situated knowledge" related to questions of coloniality, interculturality, and decolonization. Different approaches to transcendental issues, to questions of temporality, subjectivity and Being, will be developed vis a vis diverse conceptions of historicity, positionality, power and resistance. Factors of race, gender, inequality and cultural diversity will be discussed as part of the introduction of issues such as indigeneity, miscegenation, creolization, archipelagic thought, and the like. Some of the authors to be studies in the course are: Leopoldo Zea, Enrique Dussel, Santiago Castro Gomez, Nelson Maldonado Torres, Aime Cesaire, Frantz Fanon, Walter Mignolo, Anibal Quijano, Bolivar Echeverria, Sylvia Wynter, Rita Segato, Maria Lugones, et al. |
|
| | 01 | -T----- | 4:30P-7:20P | TBA | Moraña | May 7 2025 6:00PM - 8:00PM | 50 | 9 | 0 | | |
|
| | 01 | -T-R--- | 10:00A-11:20A | TBA | Baril | Paper/Project/Take Home | 15 | 15 | 0 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| Waits Not Allowed |
|
|
| Description: | The Hellenistic Age, traditionally dated from the death of Alexander and his (Macedonian) Empire at 323 BCE to the birth of Augustus' (Roman) Empire in 31 BCE, gave the West three of its most innovative and influential schools of philosophy: Epicureanism, Skepticism, and Stoicism. This course investigates the central features of their thought. Special attention is paid to the still-relevant debates between the Stoics and Skeptics about the possibility of knowledge, to the disagreements among all three schools about the issues of freedom, responsibility, and determinism, and to their ethical theories.
Prerequisites: one course in Philosophy at the 300-level, graduate standing, or permission of the instructor.
|
|
| | 01 | -T-R--- | 1:00P-2:20P | TBA | Brown | See Instructor | 20 | 17 | 8 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
|
| | 01 | M-W---- | 10:00A-11:20A | TBA | Kvanvig | Paper/Project/Take Home | 19 | 2 | 0 | | | Actions: | | Books | | Syllabus | | Syllabi are provided to students to support their course planning; refer to the syllabus for constraints on use. |
| |
|
|
| | 01 | TBA | | TBA | [TBA] | See Instructor | 0 | 0 | 0 | | |
| 02 | TBA | | TBA | [TBA] | See Instructor | 0 | 0 | 0 | | |
| 03 | TBA | | TBA | [TBA] | See Department | 0 | 0 | 0 | | |
| 04 | TBA | | TBA | [TBA] | See Department | 0 | 0 | 0 | | |
|
| | 02 | TBA | | TBA | [TBA] | No Final | 0 | 0 | 0 | Desc: | SEE DEPARTMENT FOR ENROLLMENT |
| | |
| 03 | TBA | | TBA | [TBA] | No Final | 0 | 0 | 0 | Desc: | SEE DEPARTMENT FOR ENROLLMENT |
| | |
| 04 | TBA | | TBA | [TBA] | No Final | 0 | 0 | 0 | Desc: | SEE DEPARTMENT FOR ENROLLMENT |
| | |
| 05 | TBA | | TBA | [TBA] | No Final | 0 | 0 | 0 | Desc: | SEE DEPARTMENT FOR ENROLLMENT |
| | |
|
|